Spatial Planning and Land Administration Issues in the Lagos Megacity
Abstract
The four functions of land administration are intricately linked due to the motive for land holding, especially with regard to the physical uses of land and properties as well as the socio-economic considerations. However, these roles currently lack effective coordination. This lack of coordination affects the value of land. Conversely, land values are also shaped by regulations for land-use planning, which are often set by zoning plans. Over the years, connections between different land administration functions have been challenged by the institutional arrangement. There is a need for parcel-based information to enhance the institutional role of spatial arrangement of settlements framed by land-use regulation within the context of land administration systems. This paper examines the broad overview of the concept of land administration and its impact on spatial planning in the Lagos Megacity. This is structured to review existing knowledge by exploring some of the dominant requirements of integrating spatial planning and land administration while focusing on the approaches to addressing the challenges.
References
Albrechts, L. (2006). Shifts in Strategic Spatial Planning? Some Evidence from Europe and Australia. Environment and Planning A, 38, 1149-1170. doi:10.1068/a37304
Allmendinger, P., & Haughton, G. (2010). Spatial Planning, Devolution, and New Planning Spaces. Environment and Planning C: Government and Policy, 28(5), 803–818. doi:10.1068/c09163
Beykaei, S., Miller, E., & Zhong, M. (2015). Spatial pattern recognition of the structure of urban land uses is useful for transportation and land use modelling.
Enemark, S., & Sevetdal, H. (1999). 'Cadastres. Land Information and Planning: Is decentralisation a significant key to sustainable development? Paper presented at the UN-FIG Conference on the Land Tenure and Cadastral Infrastructures for Sustainable Development, Melbourne, Australia.
Enemark, S., Williamson, I., & Wallace, J. (2005). Building Modern Land Administration Systems in Developed Economies. Journal of Spatial Science, 50 (2), 51–68.
European Commission. (1997). The EU Compendium of Spatial Planning Systems and Policies. Italy: Office for Official Publications of the European Communities.
Galderisi, A., & Colucci, A. (2018). Smart, Resilient and Transition Cities: Emerging Approaches and Tools for a Climate-Sensitive Urban Development.
Gamst, F. C. (2015). Work, Sociology of. In J. D. Wright (Ed.), International Encyclopedia of the Social & Behavioral Sciences (Second Edition) (pp. 687–693). Oxford: Elsevier.
Griffith, T. (1999). Technology Features as Triggers for Sensemaking. Academy of Management Review, p. 24. doi:10.5465/AMR.1999.2202132
Habeeb, A. (2017). Introduction to Artificial Intelligence.
Harris, N., & Hooper, A. (2004). Rediscovering the ‘spatial’ in public policy and planning: An examination of the spatial content of sectoral policy documents. Planning Theory and Practice, 5(2), 147 – 169.
Mohammadi, N., & Taylor, J. (2017). Smart city digital twins.
Nadin, V. (2007). The emergence of the spatial planning approach in England. Planning Practice & Research, 22(1), 43–62. doi:10.1080/02697450701455934
Nations, U. (2004). Guidelines on real property units and identifiers. Retrieved from
Newton, P. (2010). Beyond greenfield and brownfield: The challenge of regenerating Australia's greyfield suburbs. Built Environment, 36(1), 81–104.
Oladiti, A., Akeem, O., Olaitan, O., & Alabi, A. T. (2018). Planning Regulations and Implementation Mechanisms in Postcolonial Lagos. Journal of Globalization Studies, 9(2), 91-106. doi:10.30884/jogs/2018.01.07
Payne, G. (2000). Best Practices for Spatial Planning and Development Control in Developing Countries.
Potsiou and Ionnidis. (2006). Informal settlements in Greece: The mystery of missing information and the difficulty of their integration into the legal framework. Paper presented at the 5th FIG Regional Conference Accra, Ghana.
Singh, G., Vedrtnam, A., & Sagar, D. (2013). AN OVERVIEW OF ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE.
Taylor, N. (2010). What is this thing called spatial planning? An analysis of the British government's view. The Town Planning Review, 81(2), 193–208.
Thomas, R., Pojani, D., Lenferink, S., Bertolini, L., Stead, D., & van der Krabben, E. (2018). Is transit-oriented development (TOD) an internationally transferable policy concept? Regional Studies, 52(9), 1201-1213. doi:10.1080/00343404.2018.1428740
Tuladhar, A. M. (2004). Parcel Based Geo-Information System: Concepts and Guidelines. Retrieved from https://webapps.itc.utwente.nl/librarywww/papers_2004/phd/tuladhar.pdf
Vanessa, B. C. (2017). Zoning, Land-Use Planning, and Housing AffordabilityPolicy Analysis. (October 18, 2017). Retrieved from https://www.cato.org/sites/cato.org/files/pubs/pdf/pa-823.pdf
Wildavsky, A. (1973). If planning is everything, maybe it's nothing. Policy Sciences, 4(2), 127-153. doi:10.1007/BF01405729
Williamson, I., Enemark, S., Wallace, J., & Rajabifard, A. (2010). Land Administration for Sustainable Development. California. USA: ESRI Press.